<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two new perspectives on speech and regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lexferenda.com/17072007/two-new-perspectives-on-speech-and-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/17072007/two-new-perspectives-on-speech-and-regulation/</link>
	<description>daithí mac sithigh's blog on cyberlaw and more</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/17072007/two-new-perspectives-on-speech-and-regulation/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/17072007/two-new-perspectives-on-speech-and-regulation/#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, as always. And the whole series makes me jealous of your being there. But I'd like to make just a quick comment on Candeub's wonderful coinage of “the antitrust law for the marketplace of ideas”. First, in similar vein to Candeub's piece is  ME Stucke and AP Grunes "Antitrust and the Marketplace of Ideas" (2001) 69 Antitrust Law Journal 249 (available &lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=927409" rel="nofollow"&gt;here on SSRN&lt;/a&gt;), though Candeb's is more elegantly theorised. Second, the major discussion of the "marketplace of ideas" as a concept is the powerfurl S Ingber "The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth" (1984) 33 Duke Law Journal 1 (available &lt;a href="http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/duklr1984&#38;id=17&#38;collection=top30&#38;index=journals/duklr" rel="nofollow"&gt;here on Hein&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.jstor.org/view/00127086/ap050138/05a00030/0?frame=noframe&#38;userID=86e201ea@tcd.ie/01cc99331f00501c37dc2&#38;dpi=3&#38;config=jstor" rel="nofollow"&gt;here on JSTOR&lt;/a&gt; (subs req'd)) in which the language of antitrust economics (market failure, etc) is very much applied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, as always. And the whole series makes me jealous of your being there. But I&#8217;d like to make just a quick comment on Candeub&#8217;s wonderful coinage of “the antitrust law for the marketplace of ideas”. First, in similar vein to Candeub&#8217;s piece is  ME Stucke and AP Grunes &#8220;Antitrust and the Marketplace of Ideas&#8221; (2001) 69 Antitrust Law Journal 249 (available <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=927409" rel="nofollow">here on SSRN</a>), though Candeb&#8217;s is more elegantly theorised. Second, the major discussion of the &#8220;marketplace of ideas&#8221; as a concept is the powerfurl S Ingber &#8220;The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth&#8221; (1984) 33 Duke Law Journal 1 (available <a href="http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/duklr1984&amp;id=17&amp;collection=top30&amp;index=journals/duklr" rel="nofollow">here on Hein</a> and <a href="http://www.jstor.org/view/00127086/ap050138/05a00030/0?frame=noframe&amp;userID=86e201ea@tcd.ie/01cc99331f00501c37dc2&amp;dpi=3&amp;config=jstor" rel="nofollow">here on JSTOR</a> (subs req&#8217;d)) in which the language of antitrust economics (market failure, etc) is very much applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
