Comments on: Canada’s charter, 25 years on http://www.lexferenda.com/18042007/canadas-charter-25-years-on/ daithí mac sithigh's blog on cyberlaw & media law Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:04:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Lex Ferenda » Who deserves the credit? Who deserves the blame? http://www.lexferenda.com/18042007/canadas-charter-25-years-on/#comment-3770 Lex Ferenda » Who deserves the credit? Who deserves the blame? Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:56:19 +0000 http://www.lexferenda.com/wordpress/?p=273#comment-3770 [...] A great animation of the original (created by a student for a Flash class - an example of what I called the second side of GooTube last week (here) [...] [...] A great animation of the original (created by a student for a Flash class - an example of what I called the second side of GooTube last week (here) [...]

]]> By: grenwolde http://www.lexferenda.com/18042007/canadas-charter-25-years-on/#comment-201 grenwolde Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:10:36 +0000 http://www.lexferenda.com/wordpress/?p=273#comment-201 For more material on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms I encourage you and your readers to visit <a>www.charterofrights.ca </a>-- an unbiased, plain language, and interactive look at the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It also contains relevant case law and precedents. The website is available in English, French, Chinese (traditional), German, and Italian with 6 more languages planned. For more material on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms I encourage you and your readers to visit http://www.charterofrights.ca – an unbiased, plain language, and interactive look at the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It also contains relevant case law and precedents. The website is available in English, French, Chinese (traditional), German, and Italian with 6 more languages planned.

]]> By: David Wozney http://www.lexferenda.com/18042007/canadas-charter-25-years-on/#comment-200 David Wozney Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:32:43 +0000 http://www.lexferenda.com/wordpress/?p=273#comment-200 The "United Kingdom", referred to in the present draft of the "Canada Act, 1982, including the Constitution Act, 1982", refers to the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, not the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland". According to the British North America Act, 1867, the provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", not the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”. The “United Kingdom”, referred to in the present draft of the “Canada Act, 1982, including the Constitution Act, 1982″, refers to the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, not the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”.

According to the British North America Act, 1867, the provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, not the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”.

]]>