<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Broadcasting&#8221; licence fee for German Internet users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lexferenda.com/24102006/broadcasting-licence-fee-for-german-internet-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/24102006/broadcasting-licence-fee-for-german-internet-users/</link>
	<description>daithí mac sithigh's blog on cyberlaw &#38; media law</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sweetlouis</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/24102006/broadcasting-licence-fee-for-german-internet-users/comment-page-1/#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetlouis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/wordpress/?p=106#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>The German approach may be more logical.
tv licensee? a licensee for a TV??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The German approach may be more logical.<br />
tv licensee? a licensee for a TV??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tazus</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/24102006/broadcasting-licence-fee-for-german-internet-users/comment-page-1/#comment-5141</link>
		<dc:creator>tazus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/wordpress/?p=106#comment-5141</guid>
		<description>People!! are you living in the 21st century!!?? What's wrong with you? 
you all know very well that the tv license, now days, is another lame excuse, for the government to raise funds from the poor us...yes it made sense in the 1930, 40, 50's until the 1990... when in this country were just a few people and for a national tv station to run, the people needed to help out( and it made sense ), but now, we are at in the 21st century, battle of the fittest!! hello!! what ever happened with the right to free, uncensored information, the right to access this information freely and at whatever time you want??? we have the right to choose, a freedom of choice, there is not only the national tv station, we have other choices, if the national tv can not manage themselves than good luck and nice knowing you. But don't ask the people to chip in, when we have so much choice. 
tv licensee? a licensee for a TV?? you realize the times we are living now are much different then the time that this law was issued!? is like that law in England where in some particular time of the day, on a particular street in London you could kill a Scott and get away with it. Yeah ...That old!!
You do realize that the national tv stations are making their monies from other sides and not the tv license ...i.e. commercials...yeah a good example!! if I pay for a a national tv station to survive I expect that I am not going to be cluttered with people that are trying to sell me things that I don't need.
we should all stop paying this ridiculous tax!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People!! are you living in the 21st century!!?? What&#8217;s wrong with you?<br />
you all know very well that the tv license, now days, is another lame excuse, for the government to raise funds from the poor us&#8230;yes it made sense in the 1930, 40, 50&#8217;s until the 1990&#8230; when in this country were just a few people and for a national tv station to run, the people needed to help out( and it made sense ), but now, we are at in the 21st century, battle of the fittest!! hello!! what ever happened with the right to free, uncensored information, the right to access this information freely and at whatever time you want??? we have the right to choose, a freedom of choice, there is not only the national tv station, we have other choices, if the national tv can not manage themselves than good luck and nice knowing you. But don&#8217;t ask the people to chip in, when we have so much choice.<br />
tv licensee? a licensee for a TV?? you realize the times we are living now are much different then the time that this law was issued!? is like that law in England where in some particular time of the day, on a particular street in London you could kill a Scott and get away with it. Yeah &#8230;That old!!<br />
You do realize that the national tv stations are making their monies from other sides and not the tv license &#8230;i.e. commercials&#8230;yeah a good example!! if I pay for a a national tv station to survive I expect that I am not going to be cluttered with people that are trying to sell me things that I don&#8217;t need.<br />
we should all stop paying this ridiculous tax!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
