<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YOYOW 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/</link>
	<description>daithí mac sithigh's blog on cyberlaw &#38; media law</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fox might report, but they won&#8217;t let us decide</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3049</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fox might report, but they won&#8217;t let us decide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3049</guid>
		<description>[...] on Lex Ferenda, Daithí has highlighted that, in the US, Fox News has written to US Republican Presidential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Lex Ferenda, Daithí has highlighted that, in the US, Fox News has written to US Republican Presidential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3048</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3048</guid>
		<description>For what it's worth, a similar Canadian flap (see &lt;a href="http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/2950" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://bobtarantino.blogs.com/blog/2007/01/wouldve_said_no.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) in January provoked Michael Geist (&lt;a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=1649&#38;Itemid=125" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) into commenting that such usage would be fair use in the USA and the law ought to be changed to reach such a conclusion in Canada. I'm with you; I want someone to call Fox's bluff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, a similar Canadian flap (see <a href="http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/2950" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://bobtarantino.blogs.com/blog/2007/01/wouldve_said_no.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>) in January provoked Michael Geist (<a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1649&amp;Itemid=125" rel="nofollow">here</a>) into commenting that such usage would be fair use in the USA and the law ought to be changed to reach such a conclusion in Canada. I&#8217;m with you; I want someone to call Fox&#8217;s bluff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daithí</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator>Daithí</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3045</guid>
		<description>The latest - Fox have now decided to &lt;a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/fox-says-all-candidates-to-stop-using-images-from-news-channel/" rel="nofollow"&gt;write to &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; candidates&lt;/a&gt; with a cease-and-desist.  I hope someone calls their bluff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest - Fox have now decided to <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/fox-says-all-candidates-to-stop-using-images-from-news-channel/" rel="nofollow">write to <i>all</i> candidates</a> with a cease-and-desist.  I hope someone calls their bluff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexferenda.com/26102007/yoyow-2007/#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>Fox are playing a dangerous game. I can foresee a respectable argument that First Amendment political speech concerns make it a non-commercial fair use. And an express Federal Circuit Court holding to that effect would certainly set the cat amongst the pigeons for those broadcasters like Fox who continue to insist on restricting copyright in political debates which they host / broadcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox are playing a dangerous game. I can foresee a respectable argument that First Amendment political speech concerns make it a non-commercial fair use. And an express Federal Circuit Court holding to that effect would certainly set the cat amongst the pigeons for those broadcasters like Fox who continue to insist on restricting copyright in political debates which they host / broadcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
